(The following is based upon our official response to the plan to expand the Mark Clark -- I-526 -- Expressway. The entire position paper can be read below.)
Public criticism of the new Mark Clark Expressway expansion project has been widespread and intense. The focus of the public disapproval seems to center on the cost and the potential loss of more marshland.
In light of the road’s predicted meager reductions in driving times, the criticism is very much on target: a 35 second improvement for average trips from West Ashley and James Island and a 4 ½ minute improvement the average trip from Johns Island. And while it might bring convenience for some, the projected advantages don’t support its very high price tag of $489 million.
In the bigger view, the Mark Clark controversy is a sign that we are nearing the limit for road building in the Low Country; that we have reached a point where we must look to other transportation solutions.
It’s a matter of mathematics. Low Country open space has been disappearing rapidly. Whatever remains of it is precious.
Many of those speaking out on I-526 may be concerned mainly about the aesthetics of our wonderful region. Development has already impaired or obliterated many marsh vistas, and agricultural land has been claimed for other uses rapidly.
We are reaching the limits for traditional kinds development, the single-story, big-box variety that crowds our suburbs. In spite of this, the clamor for more roads, wider roads continues. The stock answer to traffic congestion has been: roll out more asphalt. (The proposed I-526 expansion calls for an estimated 9,266,400 square feet of asphalt, the equivalent of 16 Savannah Highway K-Mart sites or 435 football fields.)
We cringe as we see what has happened as we paved more and more of our landscape. We see the helter-skelter development it spawned, how it blighted our vistas. Our “more roads, wider roads” approach produced to too many “c”-grade businesses and buildings, discouraged development of quality communities, depressed quality of life. Everyone living in the Low Country is affected. It compels us to take a new approach to addressing our transportation issues.
There is no more “vacant land” in the Low Country. On virtually every parcel, something has been built. If not, it adds in some way to the beauty of our environment, a factor that brought many of us (or our forebears) here. Each square yard of the Low Country has become more precious and the use to which we put it a matter of critical importance.
In downtown Charleston there is zero space for more cars, whether moving or parked. Farther out, where wide, sometimes ugly roads crisscross suburbs, the public clamors for more respect for the land.
Almost everyone is in favor of growth and progress. We are delighted that Boeing is coming. We encourage startups and business expansion. We aggressively compete with other cities and states for workers. But how will we move about, all of us? More people? More business? And rapidly disappearing space for new roads?
As we face this new transportation reality, we are not alone. Cities and towns all over America and all over the world over are facing the same issues. Some of those cities are well ahead of us because they reached the critical juncture earlier. They included growth and progress among their major priorities. In many cases, overall growth and progress was directly tied to regulating the number of cars on their streets and roads. In other words, they found that business and culture actually were stimulated when these steps were taken.
In many cases the process was quite natural: increasingly limited space for cars drove up the price of driving and parking without direct government intervention. But many cities actually barred auto traffic, establishing no-car zones, or they imposed fees for using cars in certain districts. And they re-directed public money toward other transportation solutions. They thrived.
Growth and progress now force the issue here: All of us, public and politicians alike, must rally around alternative forms of transportation: commuter rail, light rail, bus rapid transit, bicycling and walking. Far from “amenities,” they are necessities, a practical matter, and ultimately, a mathematically foregone conclusion.
Within the next few years, many of us will be thinking twice before turning a key in the ignition of a car. But we too will thrive.
More roads always beget more cars; more cars perpetuate the syndrome: more roads, cars, roads; a self-defeating process. As we adopt alternatives, we will be healthier and happier for it.
The $489 million earmarked for the Mark Clark Expressway cannot be applied to any other projects, we are told. Apparently, we must live with that fact. But we can no longer live with the head-in-the-sand avoidance of alternative transportation solutions by many of our bureaucrats, transportation planners and public officials.
Tom Bradford
Charleston Moves